Showing posts with label grey wolf. Show all posts
Showing posts with label grey wolf. Show all posts

Saturday, July 9, 2011

Wandering wolf caught in Ohio neighborhood

AKRON, Ohio, June 8 (UPI) -- A wolf on the loose in Akron, Ohio, in a neighborhood near the Akron Zoo has been captured after several weeks of sightings, officials said. Residents including Pam and Larry Witherow have been attempting to capture the animal for some time, WJW-TV, Cleveland, reported Tuesday.

The Witherows currently care for two rescued wolf-hybrids on their property.




(There is a video on the original site)

Man blames violence on wolf scratch

AMHERST, Ohio, June 10 (UPI) -- Authorities in Ohio said a man arrested after behaving violently and growling at sheriff's deputies blamed his actions on a scratch from a wolf.
Lorain County sheriff's deputies said Thomas Stroup, 20, was arrested at about 12:30 a.m. Sunday after they received a call of a "very violent" male attacking people at the Timber Ridge Campground in Amherst, The Chronicle-Telegram, Elyria, Ohio.

Deputies said a friend of Stroup who was at the scene told them the suspect had consumed a large amount of alcohol and fought with other campers, who left before deputies arrived. Stroup was found sleeping under a trailer and growled at the deputies before being placed under arrest.Read on...

Monday, January 31, 2011

Wolf sighting is ruled unsubstantiated

By Miles Blumhardt • MilesBlumhardt@coloradoan.com • January 31, 2011

Was it a wolf that Ron Greenwald saw just east of Fort Collins last week, or just a big coyote?

Or could it have been a wandering wolf hybrid?

Greenwald, who lives near Colorado Highway 14 and Larimer County Road 3, is sure he saw through binoculars on Tuesday a wolf on a ridge about 100 yards away from his house catching mice in a pasture with some cut corn.

Mark Leslie, Division of Wildlife area manager for the Fort Collins-Greeley area, isn't so sure.

"I saw a wolf, but I guess I'm just a farm boy, and some people will say I saw a coyote or dog,’’ said the retired Greenwald, who worked for the U.S. Forest Service for 35 years and said he’s seen wolves in the wild in Wyoming. “I guess it could have been a wolf hybrid, but it wasn’t a coyote or dog.’’

Greenwald described the animal as the size of a good-sized dog mostly brown with some black and gray. Coyotes are mostly gray with some buff color and do not possess black coloring. Wolves are much larger than coyotes and usually are gray or black with some buff coloring.

Leslie talked to Greenwald after being informed by the Coloradoan of the sighting. After interviewing Greenwald, who did not have photos of the animal, and not finding any tracks or hair, Leslie said he has a lack of solid information that it actually was a wolf.

“The place where he saw the animal was an area with houses nearby, and that’s not typical wolf habitat,’’ said Leslie, who visited the site where Greenwald said he saw the animal. “I didn’t find anything. With nothing else to go on, the sighting is ruled unsubstantiated.’’

Wolves are classified as endangered in Colorado. The state’s wolf population was largely extirpated in the 1940s.

However, wandering wolves have made appearances from time to time in the state. Most recently, two wolves were spotted in Colorado in 2009. One died of poisoning in Eagle County.

Leslie said that’s the last confirmed sighting of wolves in Colorado of which he is aware. In February 2007, DOW wildlife managers captured brief video of what appeared to be a wolf north of Walden.

http://www.coloradoan.com/article/20110131/NEWS01/101310333/Wolf-sighting-is-ruled-unsubstantiated

Wolf sighting is ruled unsubstantiated

By Miles Blumhardt • MilesBlumhardt@coloradoan.com • January 31, 2011

Was it a wolf that Ron Greenwald saw just east of Fort Collins last week, or just a big coyote?

Or could it have been a wandering wolf hybrid?

Greenwald, who lives near Colorado Highway 14 and Larimer County Road 3, is sure he saw through binoculars on Tuesday a wolf on a ridge about 100 yards away from his house catching mice in a pasture with some cut corn.

Mark Leslie, Division of Wildlife area manager for the Fort Collins-Greeley area, isn't so sure.

"I saw a wolf, but I guess I'm just a farm boy, and some people will say I saw a coyote or dog,’’ said the retired Greenwald, who worked for the U.S. Forest Service for 35 years and said he’s seen wolves in the wild in Wyoming. “I guess it could have been a wolf hybrid, but it wasn’t a coyote or dog.’’

Greenwald described the animal as the size of a good-sized dog mostly brown with some black and gray. Coyotes are mostly gray with some buff color and do not possess black coloring. Wolves are much larger than coyotes and usually are gray or black with some buff coloring.

Leslie talked to Greenwald after being informed by the Coloradoan of the sighting. After interviewing Greenwald, who did not have photos of the animal, and not finding any tracks or hair, Leslie said he has a lack of solid information that it actually was a wolf.

“The place where he saw the animal was an area with houses nearby, and that’s not typical wolf habitat,’’ said Leslie, who visited the site where Greenwald said he saw the animal. “I didn’t find anything. With nothing else to go on, the sighting is ruled unsubstantiated.’’

Wolves are classified as endangered in Colorado. The state’s wolf population was largely extirpated in the 1940s.

However, wandering wolves have made appearances from time to time in the state. Most recently, two wolves were spotted in Colorado in 2009. One died of poisoning in Eagle County.

Leslie said that’s the last confirmed sighting of wolves in Colorado of which he is aware. In February 2007, DOW wildlife managers captured brief video of what appeared to be a wolf north of Walden.

http://www.coloradoan.com/article/20110131/NEWS01/101310333/Wolf-sighting-is-ruled-unsubstantiated

Monday, September 13, 2010

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to try to remove gray wolf from endangered species list

The Associated Press • September 13, 2010

The federal government is making a fourth run at removing gray wolves in Wisconsin, Michigan and Minnesota from the Endangered Species List.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will publish a notice in the Federal Register on Tuesday in response to petitions filed by Wisconsin, Minnesota and several groups to take the gray wolf off the list in the western Great Lakes region, which has about 4,000 wolves.

Publication will start a new 12-month review to determine whether “delisting” the wolf in the region is warranted, including a 60-day public comment period.

The federal government’s three previous efforts failed — blocked by courts or withdrawn over procedural errors.

Environmental groups are fighting the proposal. Michael Robinson of the Center for Biological Diversity said today the government needs a national wolf recovery plan instead.

http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20100913/GPG0101/100913148/Feds-try-again-to-drop-gray-wolf-as-endangered-species

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to try to remove gray wolf from endangered species list

The Associated Press • September 13, 2010

The federal government is making a fourth run at removing gray wolves in Wisconsin, Michigan and Minnesota from the Endangered Species List.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will publish a notice in the Federal Register on Tuesday in response to petitions filed by Wisconsin, Minnesota and several groups to take the gray wolf off the list in the western Great Lakes region, which has about 4,000 wolves.

Publication will start a new 12-month review to determine whether “delisting” the wolf in the region is warranted, including a 60-day public comment period.

The federal government’s three previous efforts failed — blocked by courts or withdrawn over procedural errors.

Environmental groups are fighting the proposal. Michael Robinson of the Center for Biological Diversity said today the government needs a national wolf recovery plan instead.

http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20100913/GPG0101/100913148/Feds-try-again-to-drop-gray-wolf-as-endangered-species

Saturday, May 15, 2010

LARGE CANINE KILLED IN CARTER COUNTY, MONTANA (Via Paul Cropper)

LARGE CANINE KILLED IN CARTER COUNTY
655 words
14 May 2010
US Fed News
English
Copyright 2010. HT Media Limited. All rights reserved.

HELENA, Mont., May 13 -- The Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks issued the following news release:

A large canine that had been reported as a possible wolf was killed when caught near livestock on private land between Hammond and Ekalaka in Carter County on May 11, 2010. The animal had been reported in and near livestock on several occasions in the area. FWP officials believe the animal is not a wild wolf and was of domestic origin based upon physical examination. Compared to a wild wolf, it had a small head, small feet, and facial markings that resemble a domestic husky. More obvious, however, is that the fluorescent orange pet collar is not consistent with any collars placed on a wild wolf by FWP or USDA Wildlife Services. "The nylon webbing collar with a snap closure and buckle is the type commonly found at any pet or feed supply store," said Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks game warden Troy Hinck.

The male canine was first reported April 14 when found in a pasture with livestock. The sightings were somewhat sporadic until May 10, when it was seen on a ranch a few miles away from the original sighting. According to warden Hinck, "The landowner did the right thing by calling FWP to make sure he knew the rules and laws associated with wolves in Montana and what his rights were as a Montana landowner to protect his livestock in case it was an actual wolf."

On May 11, it was near a ranch house within a pasture with livestock. The animal was killed by the property owner near the house. The incident was reported and FWP law enforcement investigated later that day. According to warden Hinck, "No charges were filed as the landowner action was justified and legal even if it turned out it was a wild wolf."

The wolf was delisted from the Federal Endangered Species Act on May 9, 2009. Montana law, administrative rules and the state wolf management plan took full effect that day.

Montana law and administrative rules (MCA 87-3-130; ARM 12.9.1301-1305) allow a person to kill a wolf that is seen in the act of attacking or killing a domestic dog not used for herding or guarding livestock. No permit is required, and FWP should be notified within 72 hours. The carcass is surrendered to FWP. Physical evidence of the wolf attack is required that would lead a reasonable person to conclude the attack was ongoing. A person may not intentionally bait a wolf with domestic dogs or livestock for the purpose of killing the wolf. Wolves may be opportunistically hazed or harassed in a non-injurious manner. Reporting to FWP within 72 hours is encouraged. Attacking or killing means the actual biting, wounding, or grasping of livestock or domestic dogs.

THESE RULES APPLY STATEWIDE CONSULT TRIBAL AUTHORITIES IF YOU LIVE WITHIN
Montana law and administrative rules (MCA 87-3-130; ARM 12.9.1301-1305) allow a person to kill a wolf that is seen in the act of attacking, killing, or threatening to kill a person. Report the incident to FWP within 72 hours.

While this turned out to be a dog at large rather than a wolf this demonstrates the legal way Montanans protect their property and work with FWP to manage this kind of incident.

In southeastern Montana it is a rare and unusual event to see a wild wolf. But in case someone does see wolves or wolf sign, contact the nearest FWP regional or state office at or use the online Wolf Observation Report at http://fwp.mt.gov/doingBusiness/contactUs/contactForm.html?action=getCustomContactForm&id=wolf_report

To report a dead wolf or possible illegal activity, call 1-800-TIP-MONT (1-800-847-6668).
For more information about USfednews please contact: Sarabjit Jagirdar, US Fed News, email:- htsyndication@hindustantimes.com

Document INDFED0020100514e65e002ha

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Mexican gray wolf on loose in Forest Lake

One of only 150 such animals globally, it is ill-equipped to fend for itself after being sprung in break-in.

By MARY LYNN SMITH, Star Tribune
Last update: February 16, 2010 - 11:36 PM

A Forest Lake science center hopes that the beckoning howls of 41 wolves and a waiting meal of venison will entice a missing Mexican gray wolf back to the cage it escaped after a break-in over the weekend.

The biggest risk, said Bob Ebsen, education director for the Wildlife Science Center, isn't to people or pets but to the missing female wolf itself. The shy 55- to 60-pound wolf has never been in the wild and has had no hunting experience. It could be shot by someone who thought it was a coyote, harassed to the point of injury or wind up as roadkill, he said.

Ebsen doesn't know who broke open the pen holding three female wolves Sunday night. "There are people out there who do things because they think it's the right thing to do, but the animal isn't benefiting now," he said. "You have a wolf that's been in a cage its whole life. It's a critically endangered species. ... They need housing facilities to recover this population."

There are fewer than 150 Mexican gray wolves on the planet, he said.

By the time Ebsen arrived at the center on Monday morning, one wolf apparently decided the cage was better than being on the run. The second wolf was found roaming within the center's fenced perimeter and was coaxed back into its pen by staff members, tranquilizer gun at the ready. The missing wolf appears to have escaped by getting over a 6-foot-high fence that now requires only a 5-foot jump or climb because of snow cover, Ebsen said. The wolf also could have found an unknown -- or newly created -- hole in the fence.

Checking on a tip Monday, Ebsen "got lucky" and caught a glimpse of the missing wolf as it ran from the sound of snowmobiles on the south end of Coon Lake. But blowing snow covered its tracks.

If you have seen the wolf or have information about it, call the Wildlife Science Center at 651-464-3993.

http://www.startribune.com/local/84507467.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUac8HEaDiaMDCinchO7DU
(Submitted by D.R. Shoop)

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Gray wolves get federal protection again

Minnesota's gray wolves once again will receive federal protection under a settlement announced Monday between the U.S. government and several groups fighting to return the wolves to the list of protected animals.

Pending court approval, gray wolves in Minnesota will return to their previous "threatened species" status, while the gray wolf populations in Wisconsin and Michigan will go back on the endangered species list.
The new designation makes it illegal for Minnesota landowners to kill wolves they catch in the act of preying upon livestock, pets or guard animals.

On May 4, federal officials removed gray wolves in the Great Lakes area from the endangered list. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, estimating that gray wolves number about 4,000 in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan, concluded they no longer needed federal help.

A coalition of environmental and animal-rights groups then filed a lawsuit challenging the decision, arguing that the government broke the law when it issued its ruling because it did not provide public notice or invite public comment.

In the settlement, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service agreed that it erred in not offering a public comment period, as required by law.

The agreement calls for a public comment period of at least 60 days should the government seek to remove the gray wolves from the endangered species list again.

Fish and Wildlife authorities wasted no time Monday in stating their aim.

"We fully expect we'll propose delisting again in a few months or so," said Laura Ragan, a fish and wildlife biologist with the service.

"There are no red flags raising that say that wolves are not recovered," she said. "The main thing is that population numbers have continued to grow, even under state management."

Among the groups suing the Fish and Wildlife Service were the Humane Society of the United States and the Center for Biological Diversity, based in Tucson, Ariz., which celebrated the settlement.

"We're absolutely delighted," said Michael Robinson, a spokesman for the Center for Biological Diversity. "We were extraordinarily worried about the wolves that were getting killed."
He called the settlement a temporary victory. "We're not so naïve as to believe that the wolves are going to be protected from this point on," Robinson said.

'Tying our hands'
Sam Scott, who manages the Rolling Thunder Ranch in Hillman, in central Minnesota, said he was disappointed by the return to protected status for the wolves.

"It's just tying our hands again," he said. "At least when they were not protected, if and when we did see one [stalking a farm animal], we could try to eliminate it. Now, the damage is done before we can ever get help."

He said he will now have to wait until a wolf kills a calf before he can act, and even then he will have to call the wolf control specialist to handle it.

So far this year, he's lost six calves to wolves, he said.

Gray wolves should have been removed from the endangered list long ago, argues David Mech, senior research scientist with the U.S. Geological Survey and an adjunct professor at the University of Minnesota.

They've been added and removed and added again to the endangered list for years. "It's always for procedural reasons," he said.

Why the back and forth?
The reason for the constant back and forth, he suggested, is that some environmental groups want to see the wolves as protected as much as possible.

The protections offered under the federal Endangered Species Act are tighter than they are under state management of the wolf population, Mech said.

Dan Stark, a wolf specialist with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, said the state's gray wolf population is thriving.

"Our population is stable and has exceeded recovery goals for decades," he said, adding that the wolves live primarily in the northern third of the state.

Gray wolves were listed as endangered in 1974, after they had been wiped out across most of the Lower 48 in the early 20th century by hunting and government-sponsored poisoning.





http://www.startribune.com/sports/outdoors/49433357.html?page=2&c=y