Showing posts with label drongos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label drongos. Show all posts

Saturday, November 20, 2010

"Gangster" bird found to charge for protection:another way we are not unique = an avian protection racket

Nov. 19, 2010

Courtesy of BBSRC and World Science staff

In what some sci­en­tists are liken­ing to a mob pro­tec­tion rack­et, a spe­cies of birds in Africa has been found to guard oth­er birds from preda­tors in ex­change for food.


On one level, the security ser­vice of­fered by the dron­go birds of the Ka­la­ha­ri Des­ert would seem to be le­git­i­mate. They do prov­ide some true pro­tect­ion—un­like quite a few ma­fios­os, who cre­ate the very threat that for a fee they will sup­posed­ly ward off.

Yet there’s a hint of the crim­i­nal in the dron­go opera­t­ion too, sci­en­tists say. The avian guards help them­selves to “pay­ment” by oc­ca­sion­ally scream­ing out false warn­ings of pred­a­tors, then us­ing the re­sult­ing con­fu­sion to snatch food from their feath­ered clients. Nor do the lat­ter seem to spe­cif­ic­ally re­quest prot­ect­ion; rath­er, the dron­gos are just—there.


The draw­backs not­with­stand­ing, the “client” birds, pied bab­blers, gain some­thing from the ar­range­ment, ac­cord­ing to sci­en­tists. That’s be­cause the self-ap­point­ed sen­t­in­els, through their pres­ence, al­low the bab­blers to fo­cus on for­ag­ing for in­sects rath­er than watch­ing their backs.

The be­hav­ior may be a rare ex­am­ple of two spe­cies evolv­ing from a par­a­sit­ic to a “mu­tu­al­ist­ic” rela­t­ion­ship, say the in­ves­ti­ga­tors, re­port­ing the find­ings in the re­search jour­nal Ev­o­lu­tion.

“Dron­gos are par­a­sit­ic birds who swoop in to steal food from oth­er spe­cies,” ex­plained An­drew Rad­ford the Uni­vers­i­ties of Bris­tol, U.K., one of the re­search­ers. Giv­en this un­sa­vory way of life, he went on, it was some­what sur­pris­ing to find that dron­gos perched above for­ag­ing bab­blers ad­ver­tise their pres­ence rath­er than keep a low pro­file.

They an­nounce them­selves “by is­su­ing a call called a ‘twank’ eve­ry four or five sec­onds,” Rad­ford said.

The ex­plana­t­ion, he added, seems to be that the “twank” re­as­sures bab­blers some­one is keep­ing a look­out against pred­a­to­ry birds. This lets the bab­blers for­age for in­sects more ef­fec­tive­ly. That, in turn, leads to bet­ter op­por­tun­i­ties for the dron­gos to filch some of the catch. “When we played back these ‘twank’ calls to a bab­bler group, we found that they spread out over a larg­er ar­ea and lifted their heads less of­ten, in­di­cat­ing that they were less fear­ful of preda­tors when they thought a dron­go was keep­ing watch,” Rad­ford said.

But when the dron­gos cry wolf about the pres­ence of preda­tors, they scare oth­er an­i­mals in­to drop­ping their catch, which the dron­gos then pounce on, said Rad­ford and col­leagues. So pied bab­blers have basic­ally evolved to tol­er­ate the dron­gos giv­ing false warn­ings and steal­ing some of their hard-earned gains in ex­change for the chance to for­age in rel­a­tive safe­ty when a dron­go is on duty.

Like a “good gang­ster,” Rad­ford said, the dron­gos—not par­tic­u­larly large bird­s—pro­vide real pro­tec­tion some­times, both by mak­ing true alarm calls and by “mob­bing” preda­tors as a group.

But “de­spite all of the use­ful ser­vic­es dron­gos pro­vide, the for­ag­ing birds are still more re­spon­sive to [a­larm] calls from oth­er bab­blers. It seems likely that the bab­blers simply don’t trust the dron­go ma­fia as much as their own flesh and blood.”

The re­search could pro­vide in­sight in­to oth­er im­por­tant mu­tu­al­is­tic and par­a­sit­ic rela­t­ion­ships in na­ture, said Doug­las Kell, chief ex­ec­u­tive of the U.K. Bi­o­tech­nol­ogy and Bi­o­log­i­cal Sci­ences Re­search Coun­cil, which funded the stu­dy. “Ev­o­lu­tion­ary arms rac­es, in­clud­ing those be­tween par­a­sites and their hosts, and plants and an­i­mals and the dis­eases that they suf­fer, un­der­lie a whole range of so­cially and eco­nom­ic­ally im­por­tant ar­e­as of bi­ol­o­gy,” he noted.

http://www.world-science.net/othernews/101119_racket.htm

"Gangster" bird found to charge for protection:another way we are not unique = an avian protection racket

Nov. 19, 2010

Courtesy of BBSRC and World Science staff

In what some sci­en­tists are liken­ing to a mob pro­tec­tion rack­et, a spe­cies of birds in Africa has been found to guard oth­er birds from preda­tors in ex­change for food.


On one level, the security ser­vice of­fered by the dron­go birds of the Ka­la­ha­ri Des­ert would seem to be le­git­i­mate. They do prov­ide some true pro­tect­ion—un­like quite a few ma­fios­os, who cre­ate the very threat that for a fee they will sup­posed­ly ward off.

Yet there’s a hint of the crim­i­nal in the dron­go opera­t­ion too, sci­en­tists say. The avian guards help them­selves to “pay­ment” by oc­ca­sion­ally scream­ing out false warn­ings of pred­a­tors, then us­ing the re­sult­ing con­fu­sion to snatch food from their feath­ered clients. Nor do the lat­ter seem to spe­cif­ic­ally re­quest prot­ect­ion; rath­er, the dron­gos are just—there.


The draw­backs not­with­stand­ing, the “client” birds, pied bab­blers, gain some­thing from the ar­range­ment, ac­cord­ing to sci­en­tists. That’s be­cause the self-ap­point­ed sen­t­in­els, through their pres­ence, al­low the bab­blers to fo­cus on for­ag­ing for in­sects rath­er than watch­ing their backs.

The be­hav­ior may be a rare ex­am­ple of two spe­cies evolv­ing from a par­a­sit­ic to a “mu­tu­al­ist­ic” rela­t­ion­ship, say the in­ves­ti­ga­tors, re­port­ing the find­ings in the re­search jour­nal Ev­o­lu­tion.

“Dron­gos are par­a­sit­ic birds who swoop in to steal food from oth­er spe­cies,” ex­plained An­drew Rad­ford the Uni­vers­i­ties of Bris­tol, U.K., one of the re­search­ers. Giv­en this un­sa­vory way of life, he went on, it was some­what sur­pris­ing to find that dron­gos perched above for­ag­ing bab­blers ad­ver­tise their pres­ence rath­er than keep a low pro­file.

They an­nounce them­selves “by is­su­ing a call called a ‘twank’ eve­ry four or five sec­onds,” Rad­ford said.

The ex­plana­t­ion, he added, seems to be that the “twank” re­as­sures bab­blers some­one is keep­ing a look­out against pred­a­to­ry birds. This lets the bab­blers for­age for in­sects more ef­fec­tive­ly. That, in turn, leads to bet­ter op­por­tun­i­ties for the dron­gos to filch some of the catch. “When we played back these ‘twank’ calls to a bab­bler group, we found that they spread out over a larg­er ar­ea and lifted their heads less of­ten, in­di­cat­ing that they were less fear­ful of preda­tors when they thought a dron­go was keep­ing watch,” Rad­ford said.

But when the dron­gos cry wolf about the pres­ence of preda­tors, they scare oth­er an­i­mals in­to drop­ping their catch, which the dron­gos then pounce on, said Rad­ford and col­leagues. So pied bab­blers have basic­ally evolved to tol­er­ate the dron­gos giv­ing false warn­ings and steal­ing some of their hard-earned gains in ex­change for the chance to for­age in rel­a­tive safe­ty when a dron­go is on duty.

Like a “good gang­ster,” Rad­ford said, the dron­gos—not par­tic­u­larly large bird­s—pro­vide real pro­tec­tion some­times, both by mak­ing true alarm calls and by “mob­bing” preda­tors as a group.

But “de­spite all of the use­ful ser­vic­es dron­gos pro­vide, the for­ag­ing birds are still more re­spon­sive to [a­larm] calls from oth­er bab­blers. It seems likely that the bab­blers simply don’t trust the dron­go ma­fia as much as their own flesh and blood.”

The re­search could pro­vide in­sight in­to oth­er im­por­tant mu­tu­al­is­tic and par­a­sit­ic rela­t­ion­ships in na­ture, said Doug­las Kell, chief ex­ec­u­tive of the U.K. Bi­o­tech­nol­ogy and Bi­o­log­i­cal Sci­ences Re­search Coun­cil, which funded the stu­dy. “Ev­o­lu­tion­ary arms rac­es, in­clud­ing those be­tween par­a­sites and their hosts, and plants and an­i­mals and the dis­eases that they suf­fer, un­der­lie a whole range of so­cially and eco­nom­ic­ally im­por­tant ar­e­as of bi­ol­o­gy,” he noted.

http://www.world-science.net/othernews/101119_racket.htm

Friday, November 5, 2010

Drongos mimic alarm calls to get a free lunch

African birds called drongos mimic other birds' alarm calls so that they can steal food from meerkats, scientists have found.

When a meerkat hears the alarm call, it drops its food and runs for cover thinking there's a predator around, allowing the drongo to get a free lunch.



Fork tailed drongo (Dicrurus adsimilis)
This is the first time scientists have shown that birds use alarm calls specifically to deceive other species.

'Meerkats have learnt to recognise the alarm calls made by different bird species and flee for cover when they hear them,' says Tom Flower from the University of Cambridge and author of the study, which is published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

This latest study suggests that fork-tailed drongos (Dicrurus adsimilis) have exploited the meerkats, using both their own and mimicked alarm calls to scare meerkats when they see them with scorpions or geckos.

Flower was working on meerkats in the Kalahari in southern Africa, when he noticed drongos following them around. He noticed the birds making alarm calls when there were no predators nearby and thought they must be doing it on purpose.

'Drongos are following meerkats and pied-babblers around in the hope of catching their food,' says Flower.

He thought the birds might moderate the number of times they lied to avoid blowing their cover. But this doesn't seem to be the case. 'They just turn up and steal as much food as they can get away with,' Flower says.

The researchers think the birds use a repertoire of alarm calls to keep meerkats on their toes, and to stop the creatures getting suspicious.


'It's like the boy who cried wolf: if drongos use the same call each and every time, meerkats will learn to ignore them, so instead they use different calls,' says Flower.

'Meerkats have to sit up and take note, because they've got too much to lose if they ignore the calls. They could lose their lives,' he adds

Drongos act as sentries for other animals - when they make alarm calls, meerkats and birds called pied-babblers know to run for cover. But if they do it too often, they won't be believed. So, they have to change which alarm call they use to stop meerkats ignoring them.


While scientists know that birds use their own and other birds' alarm calls to alert others to danger, until now, they weren't sure if the calls were used to deceive.


To show that fork-tailed drongos use deceptive alarm calls to get a free lunch, Flower's research had to satisfy three conditions. He had to show that alarm calls are used only in a deceptive context rather than an aggressive context; that true alarm calls made by drongos and other species sound the same as false alarm calls; and that meerkats and pied-babblers run for cover in response to recordings of both false and true alarm calls.

Researchers have suggested a number of possible functions for mimicry, such as that being able to copy other birds might help attract a mate, or that it lets animals communicate with other species. But no-one has shown that having a wide repertoire of calls attracts more females.

Flower's research shows a clear function for vocal mimicry, when before scientists could only speculate. He thinks mimicry is likely to be a fairly simple mechanism, and that drongos work out which calls are most effective by trial and error.


He's now keen to go back to the Kalahari to see how drongos learn to vary their calls.


by Tamera Jones

http://planetearth.nerc.ac.uk/news/story.aspx?id=856

Drongos mimic alarm calls to get a free lunch

African birds called drongos mimic other birds' alarm calls so that they can steal food from meerkats, scientists have found.

When a meerkat hears the alarm call, it drops its food and runs for cover thinking there's a predator around, allowing the drongo to get a free lunch.



Fork tailed drongo (Dicrurus adsimilis)
This is the first time scientists have shown that birds use alarm calls specifically to deceive other species.

'Meerkats have learnt to recognise the alarm calls made by different bird species and flee for cover when they hear them,' says Tom Flower from the University of Cambridge and author of the study, which is published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

This latest study suggests that fork-tailed drongos (Dicrurus adsimilis) have exploited the meerkats, using both their own and mimicked alarm calls to scare meerkats when they see them with scorpions or geckos.

Flower was working on meerkats in the Kalahari in southern Africa, when he noticed drongos following them around. He noticed the birds making alarm calls when there were no predators nearby and thought they must be doing it on purpose.

'Drongos are following meerkats and pied-babblers around in the hope of catching their food,' says Flower.

He thought the birds might moderate the number of times they lied to avoid blowing their cover. But this doesn't seem to be the case. 'They just turn up and steal as much food as they can get away with,' Flower says.

The researchers think the birds use a repertoire of alarm calls to keep meerkats on their toes, and to stop the creatures getting suspicious.


'It's like the boy who cried wolf: if drongos use the same call each and every time, meerkats will learn to ignore them, so instead they use different calls,' says Flower.

'Meerkats have to sit up and take note, because they've got too much to lose if they ignore the calls. They could lose their lives,' he adds

Drongos act as sentries for other animals - when they make alarm calls, meerkats and birds called pied-babblers know to run for cover. But if they do it too often, they won't be believed. So, they have to change which alarm call they use to stop meerkats ignoring them.


While scientists know that birds use their own and other birds' alarm calls to alert others to danger, until now, they weren't sure if the calls were used to deceive.


To show that fork-tailed drongos use deceptive alarm calls to get a free lunch, Flower's research had to satisfy three conditions. He had to show that alarm calls are used only in a deceptive context rather than an aggressive context; that true alarm calls made by drongos and other species sound the same as false alarm calls; and that meerkats and pied-babblers run for cover in response to recordings of both false and true alarm calls.

Researchers have suggested a number of possible functions for mimicry, such as that being able to copy other birds might help attract a mate, or that it lets animals communicate with other species. But no-one has shown that having a wide repertoire of calls attracts more females.

Flower's research shows a clear function for vocal mimicry, when before scientists could only speculate. He thinks mimicry is likely to be a fairly simple mechanism, and that drongos work out which calls are most effective by trial and error.


He's now keen to go back to the Kalahari to see how drongos learn to vary their calls.


by Tamera Jones

http://planetearth.nerc.ac.uk/news/story.aspx?id=856